[Zosslist] BALLPOINTS and How to handle a delusional nut?

Saul Goldberg saulgoldie at verizon.net
Tue Jun 27 17:20:10 EEST 2017

I second this. If someone is really dug in, any "discussion" with them and a reasonable, open-minded person will end up generating more heat than light. However...if I am in the presence of "liar" and someone else, I am inclined to counter "liar" to the other person with, what else, facts and reason. The trumpet, as Paul said, is unlikely to change their position. But a third party should be properly informed so they can come to their own conclusion.



Saul Goldberg
saulgoldie at verizon.net



-----Original Message-----
From: R. Paul Martin <zosslist at glib.com>
To: zosslist <zosslist at zosspens.com>
Sent: Tue, Jun 27, 2017 9:46 am
Subject: Re: [Zosslist] BALLPOINTS and How to handle a delusional nut?

On 6/26/2017 15:37, D.J.J. Ring, Jr. wrote:
> I subscribe to another list and there is a nut job that wants to 
> convince  the world that the Anne Frank Diary was a scam.
> ....
> I know that it's  difficult to win people who continue to spout untruths
> even when you can supply hard evidence, but I'm trying.

Given the above I'd say that you are, in effect, feeding the troll. Why
bother? The person is nuts and cannot be convinced to change his or her
mind. If you've countered the person once that's enough; it's a waste of
time to keep going back and forth with them.

Zosslist mailing list
Zosslist at zosspens.com
The new Zosslist thanks Northwest Penworks and PenHero.com for their support

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://zosspens.com/pipermail/zosslist/attachments/20170627/135dbb39/attachment.html>

More information about the Zosslist mailing list